Abstract

There is an urgent need for ethical, conceptual, and clinical clarity regarding the diagnosis and treatment of gender dysphoria and transgender identification. In this essay, I highlight ten critical concerns in this arena, namely, those involving: (1) conceptual parallels between sexual reassignment surgery and elective limb amputation; (2) the lack of long-term data that demonstrates reliable long-term relief from gender dysphoria in those undergoing hormonal or surgical treatment for gender dysphoria; (3) special problems with informed consent in the context of “gender affirming” treatments; (4) the importance of very high desistance rates of gender dysphoria and transgender identification, particularly in children, even without treatment; (5) the extensive differential diagnosis and the need for thorough and subtle assessments in the face of gender-related complaints; (6) a deep religiously based objection to transgender ideology involving the ordering of creation; (7) controversies concerning the existence of rapid-onset gender dysphoria; (8) the recent depathologizing of gender dysphoria; (9) the roles of genetics and environment in transgender identification and gender dysphoria; and (10) reflections on the role of psychotherapeutic treatment in patients with gender dysphoria and transgender identification.

Keywords: transgenderism, gender dysphoria, transsexualism, sexual reassignment surgery, gender affirming care